RE: An argument against God
September 29, 2014 at 1:49 pm
(This post was last modified: September 29, 2014 at 1:52 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
The antecedent does not satisfy the conditions of sufficiency or necessity regarding the consequent, therefore the "if" or "if and only if" operators cannot be relied upon to lead to truth. To put it another way, the premise you've chosen cannot be adequately handled by the argument structure that you've chosen. You'll need a different structure or a different premise (or both) - or a different natural language entirely.
Good luck.
Good luck.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
