RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
September 30, 2014 at 12:10 pm
(September 30, 2014 at 12:03 pm)rasetsu Wrote:(September 30, 2014 at 11:07 am)Huggy74 Wrote: https://pistrucciartworks.wordpress.com/...roportion/
Wrong.
Quote:Navels. We read that you can reveal φ by measuring the height of a person and the height of the person's navel, measured from the floor. The ratio of navel height to total height is supposed to be φ. And with the current interest in navels, the implication is that this is one indicator of attractive bodily proportions. Has anyone checked real people? In the interest of science I checked that assertion for a large sample of the most popular swimsuit models. This should check the claim that bodies judged "beautiful" should have the ideal characteristics of form, including the ideal navel height. [It's a tough job, but someone has to do it.] The results averaged 0.58±0.01, with rather small variation. So much for that myth.
http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/pseudo/fibonacc.htm
first of all, how does this egg-head have access to the most popular swimsuit models?