RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
September 30, 2014 at 3:40 pm
(This post was last modified: September 30, 2014 at 3:43 pm by Huggy Bear.)
(September 30, 2014 at 3:15 pm)Bibliofagus Wrote:(September 30, 2014 at 2:55 pm)Surgenator Wrote: All measurements come with an error i.e. all measurements are inaccurate to a certain degree. I couldn't find were they quoted the errors (if they ever did, old papers are notorious for this). However, I made an assumption that work done in 1953 and more recent work (with better computers, better instruments and refined methods) give a smaller error. Hence, the recent data is more accurate. The old work is not obsolete. Their measurement has a bigger error.
It is the difference between first measuring pi=3+-0.2 and the newer measurement of pi=3.14+-0.002.
I understood
Just trying to point out two crazy turns this conversation took, and to highlight you were being misrepresented.
He is not being misrepresented, the whole debate is about the dimensions of DNA, if the dimensions from 1953 are, as he claims, invalid, then what is his document from 1953 supposed to prove?
