RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
October 2, 2014 at 8:35 am
(October 2, 2014 at 6:00 am)Huggy74 Wrote: It is HIS assertion that the measurement I gave on DNA is obsolete because it is from 1953, thereby making his own information on anything related to the measurement of DNA from 1953, also invalid.That isn't what he said.
(September 30, 2014 at 2:33 pm)Surgenator Wrote: Ok blockhead, let me introduce you to a concept of original work to follow-up work. The original came up with the idea and did a measurement. The follow-up did a better measurement and tries to remove at least one assumption. I don't consider 1953 work obsolete. It was the first to provide an explanation for general structure of DNA. I consider their measurement not as accurate compared to the new ones. Hence, I use the new measurement not the original.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould
-Stephen Jay Gould
