RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
October 2, 2014 at 9:24 am
(October 2, 2014 at 9:10 am)Huggy74 Wrote: That's exactly what he said,It means that additional work has yielded additional information that makes the measurements more accurate. Not obsolete. You grasped at a pair of numbers that you felt had some sort of cosmic significance, and when shown that those measurements are not absolute you have tried to make his comment the issue instead of recognizing that you were chasing a false trail.
"I consider their measurement not as accurate compared to the new ones."
What does that mean genius.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould
-Stephen Jay Gould