RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
October 2, 2014 at 9:54 am
(This post was last modified: October 2, 2014 at 9:54 am by Huggy Bear.)
(October 2, 2014 at 9:24 am)Tonus Wrote:(October 2, 2014 at 9:10 am)Huggy74 Wrote: That's exactly what he said,It means that additional work has yielded additional information that makes the measurements more accurate. Not obsolete. You grasped at a pair of numbers that you felt had some sort of cosmic significance, and when shown that those measurements are not absolute you have tried to make his comment the issue instead of recognizing that you were chasing a false trail.
"I consider their measurement not as accurate compared to the new ones."
What does that mean genius.
Seriously?
If you have additional information that makes the new measurements more accurate, you would no longer continue to use the inaccurate measurements now, would you? Making them obsolete...
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/obsolete
Quote:obsolete
[ob-suh-leet, ob-suh-leet]
adjective
1.no longer in general use; fallen into disuse:
an obsolete expression.
2.of a discarded or outmoded type; out of date:
You trying so hard to defend this in the face of facts, is no different than the zealotry displayed by so-called "fundies".