Is nihilism the logical extreme of atheism?

[Violet]

Yeah, that's precisely what I mean. What the fuck else could I even possibly be talking about? (Hey, what do you know, we seem to understand each other--amazing! Wait, wait... GODDUNNIT!)

If we understand each other, then you're speaking out of your ass. This is a talent I do not posses... and I cannot help but to respect it. Your ability to draw conclusions of truth out of thin air is an absolute miracle of the organic machine... and this is the only reason why synthetics will not be our end all in the end.

Ah, the ad hominem... the go-to card when you have nothing substantial to say. Thanks for that confession though.

You don't seem to know what an ad hominem is. What you were delivered could at best be a straw man, which is only so if it is infact not the ultimate end of what you were arguing (it is).

If it's not what you're arguing, then do try again... this time without the infantile "quotations" around every word you have to use to try to defend your childlike "belief" in "truth". Hopefully, you're better at doing this than you are at recognizing personal attacks... as we might be here all week if so.

There's a reason you call it "basic" philosophy.

Yes, that was much how I felt reading that trite you put forward. Care to try again? Don't pull any punches this time... show me what you've got

---

Is that how you feel?

No, i feel like logic is a flawed process in the first place. That's what my experience with the universe suggests, after all

Congrats on passing grade school philosophy.

You would do well to return to grade school, as you seem ignorant about what is taught within its walls.

---

Of course our perception of truth is dynamic. Jesus Christ, congrats on passing grade school philosophy.

Your ability to edit after-the-fact somehow doesn't credit you any additional leverage. You might make better use of such extra time by thinking it through the first time.

---

Experience should also have inculcate the feeling that feeling true is an inadequate criteria for assessing the truth of a proposition.

Oh? How on earth would you know?

Is your ability to assess 'truth' so magnificent that you can even reach objectivity in your analysis of it? hock: