I can't follow your points gen if you don't leave the relevant quote in place.
Omnibenevolence is a misunderstood attribute. Christians often misrepresent biblical teaching by citing it. I did it myself long ago. To put it simply, it simply isn't an attribute of the Christian God.
Works vs faith is a complex one. He's very young. Christians believe in faith, not works.
Objective morality and non appliance... two sides of the same coin.
None of these are deal breakers IMO.
Flawed claim? Of the bible being so far inerrant? I've tried hard to find evidence but found none.
Why is a just world outlook preferable? I think I covered that in my 1st post in this thread.
Surely it's the nature of knowledge to want to know more. Full knowledge of your subject is logically unknowable, unless you're God.
Quote:There is the other thread regarding god's omnibenevolence. Then there is the new gonna-be-catholic member who who favors works, not faith. Then there are members who think god's morality is objective and others who think morality doesn't apply to god. There are contradictions all over the place.When I refer to Christians here, I'm referencing mainstream and not JW's, Mormons etc. k.
Omnibenevolence is a misunderstood attribute. Christians often misrepresent biblical teaching by citing it. I did it myself long ago. To put it simply, it simply isn't an attribute of the Christian God.
Works vs faith is a complex one. He's very young. Christians believe in faith, not works.
Objective morality and non appliance... two sides of the same coin.
None of these are deal breakers IMO.
Flawed claim? Of the bible being so far inerrant? I've tried hard to find evidence but found none.
Why is a just world outlook preferable? I think I covered that in my 1st post in this thread.
Surely it's the nature of knowledge to want to know more. Full knowledge of your subject is logically unknowable, unless you're God.