Is nihilism the logical extreme of atheism?

[fr0d0]

No, I don't disagree with mainstream Christians on omnibenevolence. The mainstream Christian view is that God is not omnibenevolent
Faith vs works. Yes, he's wrong about his faith. His faith is consisteent with my own. Everyone makes mistakes.
I saw nothing contradictory about morality, no.

These examples don't qualify as contradictory. I've been mistaken myself plenty times. I think I have been this week where Lek has corrected me. Never have I claimed perfect knowledge, and neither has any other Christian here as far as I'm aware. And why would they? If a Christian was to claim perfection, then that would contradict the basic tenet that humans are flawed now wouldn't it?

No, mainstream Christianity does consider your god omnibenevolent.And according to the latest pope, its works not faith. The fact that you don't see these contradictions doesn't mean there are no contradictions.

Finally, you did claim flawless knowledge, which is synonymous with perfect knowledge.

Mainstream Christianity does not consider god to be omnibenevolent. Period lol.
You misunderstand the pope then.

I don't claim flawless knowledge at all. I claim currently inerrant information. And that stands until proven otherwise.

Feel free to correct me. What can I do? I've been looking for many years now. Where is your evidence?

Hundreds of threads in this very forum are filled with evidence - what you can do is actually look through them. Its not that hard - just type "errors in bible" in the search and you get 95 pages worth of posts.

I've been here 5 years and seen most of them. All are complete BS. Nothing has come close. Seriously. I'm not talking biased perspective here. I'm looking for fault.

Purpose/ outlook. Purpose built upon a just outlook, as I've expanded upon several times now.

Can you point a post where you prove that its preferable?

I explained it again for you. At some point you're going to need to address it. Saying "I don't get it" won't do. To me it's as plain as the nose on your face.

My point being... a moral outlook based upon an unfair world is inferior to a moral outlook based upon a fair world.

That is what you are required to prove - still waiting.

It's self explanatory. I'm sorry that you don't get it.

So who knows everything? Do you?

Why does anyone have to know everything?

I have no idea, you said it!

The nature of knowledge has no wants. And its your presupposition that full knowledge is logically unknowable.