Is nihilism the logical extreme of atheism?

[Mystical]

---

I didn't just repeat them gen. I put them in my own words, and then did that afresh a few times just to try to help you guys understand it. You're still trying to misrepresent my original statement. Let me try one more time.

Reality one: unfair
Reality two: fair

Person living reality one: his decisions/ moral values are based upon the scope of reality as he knows and experiences it. If he knows a murderer will never get punished, justice to him could only come from equal suffering dealt to the perpetrator.

Person in reality two, has no concern about exacting revenge, because he knows justice to be enacted. He feels no need to punish over and above what might be fair to compensate for any lack of justice.

Therefore moral standards from the two perfective are different. The moral standard of the person in reality one is inferior to the standard of the person in reality two. Because person one acts given injustice.

---

Morality restricted by injustice is a limited morality.
Morality unrestricted is not limited.
Therefore morality based upon a fair reality is superior to morality based upon an unfair reality.

Why must there be justice?
To make you feel better about what happened??

If someone killed my family member, its a moot point, really, what happens next. They're dead.

Why do you think revenge in kind-- earthly or supernaturally-- is 'moral' , at all?
I mean, I can see how believing the murderer will 'get his in the end' could soothe your feelings on the matter, but at what cost?
You want all the other non murderers like me who simply don't believe in the afterlife: to suffer eternally as well?

.. Because, that's what your bible says.

We had a whole thread discussion about it, and concluded that you couldn't account for why you believe what you believe about hell, because you have no reason other than your subjective feelings on the matter, to not believe the god of the bible when he said nonbelievers are going to eternal hell.

Therefore morality based upon a fair reality is superior to morality based upon an unfair reality.

Being that there is no fair reality whatsoever (killing my brother then me killing or punishing you in this life or the next-- does not bring back my brother), how can you say your reality is superior when the price paid for your fairness, is eternal torture for the majority of your brethren?

Injustice= Reality
(get over it)