Is nihilism the logical extreme of atheism?

[fr0d0]

That's the theory of the big bang. It just appeared.

No, it's not. At the point of the Big Bang, there was maximum entropy - that is, no information at all.

Isn't that the same thing?

---

Thanks for the support.

Confusing dissent with support, huh? - Well, that is to be expected given the bizarro nature of your beliefs.

When someone repeats what you say, to me that's assent.

You're confusing the application of words. Again. The singularity contained all possible information of everything that will ever exist in this universe. It contained the blueprint of all substance. If you didn't have the potential to absorb information and use it, then you wouldn't absorb or use it.

The bolded part is the claim that you are required to prove. Your potentiality argument is not sufficient to prove that. Once again, "potential to absorb information" or even "potential to create information" is not the same as "containing all possible information".

I would start to try if I thought you were on the same page.

My perspective is different > my moral understanding is different > my quality of life is different.

Different? Sure. Better? Prove it.

That's the proof. If the logic follows for 'different', which you've just acknowledged, then it also follows for 'better'. Wider moral latitude = more information = more informed decision.

I'll ignore this as trolling. If you can make a point, go for it. At the moment your lack of input is noted.

The point is simple: Your argument goes like this -
1. Morality of revenge requires sufficient knowledge to condemn.
2. Humans don't have sufficient knowledge to condemn.
Therefore, revenge is always immoral for humans.

You failed to establish what constitutes sufficiency of knowledge - making your premise 1 vague.
You failed to establish premise 2 are true.
Therefore your conclusion is invalid.

If you don't successfully challenge 1 or 2, then the conclusion stands.
1. If you can't ever know sufficiently of someone's guilt, then you can't make a moral judgement. We're talking about ultimate justice here. The ability to know thoroughly a persons motivations for their every thought and deed.
2. No human can know that they have sufficient knowledge of another persons guilt.
These are indisputable fact.