(October 12, 2014 at 2:22 pm)Rhythm Wrote:(October 12, 2014 at 2:05 pm)Clueless Morgan Wrote: Can anti-GMO people produce scientifically rigorous studies that conclude that GMO foods are more harmful than beneficial?Sure, depending on what fulcrum you want to lay harmful and beneficial upon. GMO isn't very good for biodiversity (based on projected economic effects if nothing else) - even though it requires biodiversity as a toolkit. But thats -on farm- biodiversity (albeit of a global sort), not exactly teeming with multitudinous expressions of the wonder of life as-is....eh?
You (and others) are conflating creating/using GMOs with misusing GMOs.
Your concern above is with monoculture - that's a dangerous thing GMO or not.
What are we talking about here? Biology, public policy, farming practices, patent policy, fear-mongering, what?
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
