The problem with GMOs from a consumer's point of view is simply that they're unnecessary.
Think about it. GMOs may be more resistant to pests and diseases, adaptable to more climates, etc. I.e., they're supposed to give a bigger yield than their natural counterparts, making the food produced less expensive.
But, do a portion of the cost savings filter down to the consumer?
Cheerios (my favorite dry cereal) announced a few months ago that they were eliminating GMO oats. The price didn't go up. back when they did use GMO, the price didn't go down.
The benefits gained from the technology are seemingly all going to the producers. If they gave consumers a cut, they might find some allies.
Think about it. GMOs may be more resistant to pests and diseases, adaptable to more climates, etc. I.e., they're supposed to give a bigger yield than their natural counterparts, making the food produced less expensive.
But, do a portion of the cost savings filter down to the consumer?
Cheerios (my favorite dry cereal) announced a few months ago that they were eliminating GMO oats. The price didn't go up. back when they did use GMO, the price didn't go down.
The benefits gained from the technology are seemingly all going to the producers. If they gave consumers a cut, they might find some allies.
