(October 16, 2014 at 11:10 am)alpha male Wrote: The problem with GMOs from a consumer's point of view is simply that they're unnecessary.
Think about it. GMOs may be more resistant to pests and diseases, adaptable to more climates, etc. I.e., they're supposed to give a bigger yield than their natural counterparts, making the food produced less expensive.
But, do a portion of the cost savings filter down to the consumer?
Cheerios (my favorite dry cereal) announced a few months ago that they were eliminating GMO oats. The price didn't go up. back when they did use GMO, the price didn't go down.
The benefits gained from the technology are seemingly all going to the producers. If they gave consumers a cut, they might find some allies.
Might not effect the price all that much, but it can change the amount of food produced and with a popuation that's already more than the world can really handle, massive starvation is almost inevitable without some kind of technology to increase our global food supply.
I live on facebook. Come see me there. http://www.facebook.com/tara.rizzatto
"If you cling to something as the absolute truth and you are caught in it, when the truth comes in person to knock on your door you will refuse to let it in." ~ Siddhartha Gautama
"If you cling to something as the absolute truth and you are caught in it, when the truth comes in person to knock on your door you will refuse to let it in." ~ Siddhartha Gautama