How to argue this point?

[Fidel_Castronaut]

""I had ' Faith' before I gained physical evidence as Faith is the reality of what is hoped for, the proof of what is unseen , whereas I get the impression that you may believe that there was originally nothing , when nothing happened and nothing magically exploded for no reason thus creating everything , that's Atheism btw and where's your evidence for that ?""

Verbose, Tangential and ultimately irrelevant to the initial claim.

You're right, he gave up.

RE: The bold. Post this picture and let him figure it out:



EDIT: If he's still interested ask him why exactly he thinks you should just take his claim prima facie? Why does his claim that Jesus healed him deserve to be believed without evidence?

EDIT II: Invite him here and let him give us atheists a good kicking with his evidence.