*sigh* This is simply the First Cause argument dressed in borrowed robes. Two questions:
1. Why should any particular cause be exempt from contingency?
2. What are the logical or physical objections to infinite causal regress?
Until these two are answered sufficiently to forestall reasonable objections, FC simply remains just one more case of special pleading.
Boru
1. Why should any particular cause be exempt from contingency?
2. What are the logical or physical objections to infinite causal regress?
Until these two are answered sufficiently to forestall reasonable objections, FC simply remains just one more case of special pleading.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax