(October 24, 2014 at 6:11 pm)Heywood Wrote:(October 24, 2014 at 10:39 am)Chas Wrote: Randomness requires no intelligence. Your argument is stupid on every level.
He isn't saying randomness requires intelligence. He is saying randomness is a manifestation of intelligence. I agree with him. Randomness in some sense is a manifestation of at least a rudimentary intellect.
No, it isn't. That doesn't make any sense. There is randomness exhibited by purely physical systems, no intelligence involved.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
