Why Something Rather Than Nothing?

[datc]

How about we agree to an intermediate statement:

It's up to a theist to present a concept of God and to provide reasons why it refers, and it's up to an atheist to follow and understand the argument and to evaluate it fairly.

The point is, we all have to, well, think hard.

No, you have to provide evidence for that god. Concepts are a dime a dozen.

Chas, here I was thinking you were a really tough-minded motherf*cker, and you go and write something like that, demonstrating that apparently, you can't read.

I wrote, "to present a concept of God AND to provide reasons why it refers." "Refers," as in has an actual reference? As in provide reasons (evidence) for why this concept exists?

You can do better than that.