Not the old "we've never seen abiogenesis therefore god" argument AGAIN.
For one thing science isn't finished yet and there have been discoveries that suggest workable mechanisms for abiogenesis.
For another even if abiogenesis was disproven it would not be evidence FOR a god you know what would be evidence that god did something, evidence that this creature exists.
And thirdly, the failed god hypothesis has no explanatory aspect to it, saying god did it is not sufficient. I want details, I want the scientifically backed up reasons as to how god did it not just a hand wave and a "he just did".
Theists pick holes at the current gaps in our scientific knowledge but offer nothing to replace it. They would wind back the clock to the dark ages if they could.
Rant over.
For one thing science isn't finished yet and there have been discoveries that suggest workable mechanisms for abiogenesis.
For another even if abiogenesis was disproven it would not be evidence FOR a god you know what would be evidence that god did something, evidence that this creature exists.
And thirdly, the failed god hypothesis has no explanatory aspect to it, saying god did it is not sufficient. I want details, I want the scientifically backed up reasons as to how god did it not just a hand wave and a "he just did".
Theists pick holes at the current gaps in our scientific knowledge but offer nothing to replace it. They would wind back the clock to the dark ages if they could.
Rant over.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
