(October 26, 2014 at 1:24 am)FifthElement Wrote: So datc , did you ever read the article I suggested on page 5 about infinite regress or did you just choose not to comment ?There may be an infinite number of moments in time (such as stretching backward to infinity), as well as an infinite number of abstracta, such as numbers; but not an infinite number of real objects, such as atoms or angels. I wrote:
Here is the link (again):
About Infinite Regress
What do you think about it ?
Quote:The quantity of real objects is measured by actual numbers. But "infinity" is a mathematical abstraction; it's not number.Heywood objected that God's creating angels "for eternity" or say, every hour, would result in an infinitude of angels. This isn't a good example. Angels already exist in time. God cannot start at t = -infinity, because -infinity is not a date. But if God starts at a determinate date, there is a finite number of hours to pass through from it to arrive at today. Hence, the number of angels would in any case remain finite.