(October 25, 2014 at 8:07 pm)Heywood Wrote:(October 25, 2014 at 1:23 pm)Pickup_shonuff Wrote: That being said, if we're forced to choose between torture and collateral damage, I would have to say the former is less unethical and should be employed if, and only if, there is substantive reason to believe that when done the possibility of the latter will be removed.
The amount of torture needs to be measured or balanced. It would be morally wrong to torture Lois Lerner by waterboarding....but not wrong to torture her with imprisonment.
How about giving her the Medal of Freedom for doing her job and not rewarding Tea Party fucknuts with tax exempt status they did not deserve?