(October 26, 2014 at 6:01 pm)Esquilax Wrote: In short, why the hell should I care what Craig thinks about anything, when he's already demonstrated his lack of respect for facts?
@Esquilax, You are rejecting an argument that you haven't even heard....because you don't like the man who made it. Do you know what fallacy this is?
@datc, telling us to simply go read a book is not good argumentation either. Maybe you can re-tell in your own words this argument from Craig which you claim backs your position that there can not be a infinite number of real things. Doing so would help us to judge this argument on the soundness of its logic and premises instead of on the authority of WLC.