RE: Why Something Rather Than Nothing?
October 27, 2014 at 9:58 am
(This post was last modified: October 27, 2014 at 10:06 am by Heywood.)
(October 27, 2014 at 9:45 am)Esquilax Wrote: The reason I reject the argument isn't because I don't like Craig, and I trust anyone willing to go back one page will be able to see your dishonest oversimplification of my position for what it is. The reason I reject it is because Craig is a presuppositionalist conman; he's ill educated, demonstrably dishonest, and states from the outset he refuses to come to the discussion honestly. Why should anyone trust the word of a man whose position is "I'm not going to consider anything that doesn't confirm what I already believe."?- bolded by me
Okay I got it. Its not that you don't dislike Craig. Its that there are certain things about Craig you dislike.....namely everything. If you're not rejecting the argument because you find a premise suspect or a fault in logic....and your rejecting it because you find a fault with Craig....you're committing an ad hominem fallacy(the exception being if the argument is one from authority).
Here, watch this video. Maybe you will realize where you are going wrong.
