(October 27, 2014 at 10:10 am)Esquilax Wrote: It would be an ad hominem fallacy if the reasons I presented were irrelevant to the argument being had. Do you deny that Craig's position, "I will disregard anything that does not already agree with me," in addition to his history of deliberate distortion of science, is relevant to his argument?
You don't even know the details of the argument you are rejecting....so you can't credibly say anything about it.
Its sad because your hatred of Craig is preventing you from learning some critical thinking skills.
