Why Something Rather Than Nothing?

[Esquilax]

You presuppose every argument Craig makes is bad. You're guilty of "presuppositionalism".

Recognizing other people's presuppositionalism is not presuppositionalism. It's a simple acceptance of the facts: Craig presupposes the truth of his religious worldview in the face of any and all facts. This is a thing that he has stated to be true, and merely understanding that this is totally what he has said is not literally the same thing as what he's doing, that's lunacy.

And it's fascinating that the guy accusing me of a fallacy for so long leaps so easily to the tu cuoque fallacy himself.

Besides, I'm an atheist, and I'm familiar with Craig's roster of arguments too. Why wouldn't I think that a worldview that only leads to the christian god would be full of bad arguments? Not believing in god is kinda the job description, here. If I thought an argument in favor of god was true, I wouldn't be an atheist.