(October 29, 2014 at 5:02 am)Riketto Wrote: It seems that you are running a bit too fast with your fantasy.
Where you got the idea that what was used 2000 km. away was also used in Varanasi.
It wasn't used in Varanasi - because there was no Varanasi around at that time. Varanasi co-existing with Mohenjo Daro is your fantasy, not mine.
(October 29, 2014 at 5:02 am)Riketto Wrote: The knowledge to make mortared brick was not available in eastern India otherwise there would be evidence in other places around Varanasi.
And if there were any people living near Varanasi then, you'd find all sorts of other artifacts, as you to with contemporary settlements - there is none to be found.
(October 29, 2014 at 5:02 am)Riketto Wrote: By the way your statement that in Mohenjo-daro mud bricks were not used in incorrect.
As you can read in the article it say that ...........Most were built of fired and mortared brick; some incorporated sun-dried mud-brick and wooden superstructures.
.....how did you work out that the mud bricks were just mud without straws?
It probably did use straws - but that would just prove you more wrong. You keep repeating that "mud and straw" buildings couldn't last 4000 years and yet, here are buildings of Mohenjo Daro with mud and straw bricks that have lasted longer.
(October 29, 2014 at 5:02 am)Riketto Wrote: Here some more evidence.
http://www.ancient-origins.net/news-hist...discovered
Evidence of what, exactly? All this says is there were people around 7000 years ago who lived in caves and drew pictures of crocodiles. It says nothing about those people practicing yoga or worshiping Shiva or speaking Sanskrit.