Why do atheists deny that they are just biorobots?

[Esquilax]

A very laudable approach to epistemology although you know i disagree with your conclusion. So in your mind atheism is something to which you reason, not something from which you reason.

You're only just figuring this out? When was the last time you had a discussion on this forum, and the reason one of the atheists gave you for why they'd reached a naturalistic conclusion was "because atheism is true," rather than... you know, an actual supporting reason?

That's what I find so strange about your position here; you say that atheism entails all these extra things, but a brief look at the actual discussions people have here reveals that actually, there are justifications present based on observations of the world that have nothing to do with atheism, naturalism etc, and everything to do with those specific observations?