Ace -
When I said no government, I didn't mean no state "infrastructure" or system at all, or no constitution. What I meant was that the people would be "governed" by their constitution, and the laws which they propose, which would be "governed" by the constitution.The people would be free to propose a law or a change to the law whereby murder is allowed, but it would never pass as that would be unconstitutional. So when I say no government, I mean that there would not be a class of people who make decisions for everyone else. There would be guidance, yes, but the people would have a lot of power. And I disagree about people not knowing what's best. With a decent constitutionto ensure that things don't get out of hand, people are generally much more qualified and able to decide for themselves how they want to live. Besides, there is no vetting system for politicians, wheas the people are already qualified by virtue of being the people. They know what they want and don't want. In the current system (and I say current because within 10 years or most likely much less it will end, that means worldwide) people vote within the choices that they're given, which doesn't reflect what they truly want.
When I said no government, I didn't mean no state "infrastructure" or system at all, or no constitution. What I meant was that the people would be "governed" by their constitution, and the laws which they propose, which would be "governed" by the constitution.The people would be free to propose a law or a change to the law whereby murder is allowed, but it would never pass as that would be unconstitutional. So when I say no government, I mean that there would not be a class of people who make decisions for everyone else. There would be guidance, yes, but the people would have a lot of power. And I disagree about people not knowing what's best. With a decent constitutionto ensure that things don't get out of hand, people are generally much more qualified and able to decide for themselves how they want to live. Besides, there is no vetting system for politicians, wheas the people are already qualified by virtue of being the people. They know what they want and don't want. In the current system (and I say current because within 10 years or most likely much less it will end, that means worldwide) people vote within the choices that they're given, which doesn't reflect what they truly want.
