Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 28, 2024, 5:58 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bar stool economics
#27
RE: Bar stool economics
(November 12, 2014 at 1:23 am)Surgenator Wrote: [quote='Heywood' pid='795026' dateline='1415767000']

How are you defining "marginal tax cut"? I take it you mean a reduction in the marginal tax rate?

Whatever the percent pay distribution was for the $100, apply that same percent distribution to the $80.

So if the richest man paid $60 dollars when the bill was $100 he should pay $48 dollars when the bill is $80? The richest man still gets the biggest refund or biggest liability drop in dollar terms looking at it from that way.

(November 12, 2014 at 1:23 am)Surgenator Wrote: Yes, the rich and poor do share some services. Here are some that they don't.
http://business.time.com/2013/01/30/bad-...oure-rich/
http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_2...gage-rates

I skimmed these and they aren't about government services. One claimed rich people pay less for auto insurance and another claimed rich people get better interest rates on mortgages.

(November 12, 2014 at 4:30 am)Cato Wrote: So, after all your blustering you agree that the government is required to give the poor some semblancce of benefit? Could you possibly imagine what the poor would be like if it weren't for the government wasting resources on 'ragbag of safetynet programs'?

Yes the government is wasting money with a rag bag of safety nets. They should just give poor people money in the form of a universal basic income.

(November 12, 2014 at 4:30 am)Cato Wrote: Since you've already proven yourself to be an economic dimwit, allow me to use the socratic method...

No Cato...you're the dimwit....I'm done talking to you.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Bar stool economics - by Heywood - November 9, 2014 at 7:46 pm
RE: Bar stool economics - by Brian37 - November 9, 2014 at 8:07 pm
RE: Bar stool economics - by Heywood - November 9, 2014 at 8:17 pm
RE: Bar stool economics - by Brian37 - November 9, 2014 at 8:23 pm
RE: Bar stool economics - by Heywood - November 9, 2014 at 8:27 pm
RE: Bar stool economics - by Brian37 - November 9, 2014 at 8:37 pm
RE: Bar stool economics - by Surgenator - November 9, 2014 at 9:07 pm
RE: Bar stool economics - by Heywood - November 9, 2014 at 10:24 pm
RE: Bar stool economics - by Surgenator - November 9, 2014 at 11:38 pm
RE: Bar stool economics - by Heywood - November 10, 2014 at 4:08 pm
RE: Bar stool economics - by Cato - November 10, 2014 at 5:50 pm
RE: Bar stool economics - by Surgenator - November 10, 2014 at 7:11 pm
RE: Bar stool economics - by Heywood - November 10, 2014 at 8:54 pm
RE: Bar stool economics - by Surgenator - November 10, 2014 at 11:20 pm
RE: Bar stool economics - by Heywood - November 10, 2014 at 11:30 pm
RE: Bar stool economics - by Surgenator - November 11, 2014 at 12:10 am
RE: Bar stool economics - by Heywood - November 11, 2014 at 8:52 pm
RE: Bar stool economics - by Surgenator - November 12, 2014 at 12:08 am
RE: Bar stool economics - by Heywood - November 12, 2014 at 12:36 am
RE: Bar stool economics - by Surgenator - November 12, 2014 at 1:23 am
RE: Bar stool economics - by Heywood - November 12, 2014 at 10:34 am
RE: Bar stool economics - by Surgenator - November 12, 2014 at 2:13 pm
RE: Bar stool economics - by Heywood - November 12, 2014 at 7:28 pm
RE: Bar stool economics - by Surgenator - November 12, 2014 at 7:58 pm
RE: Bar stool economics - by Heywood - November 12, 2014 at 9:30 pm
RE: Bar stool economics - by Surgenator - November 12, 2014 at 10:06 pm
RE: Bar stool economics - by Heywood - November 12, 2014 at 10:12 pm
RE: Bar stool economics - by Surgenator - November 12, 2014 at 10:19 pm
RE: Bar stool economics - by Cato - November 12, 2014 at 4:30 am
RE: Bar stool economics - by Cato - November 11, 2014 at 7:25 am
RE: Bar stool economics - by Brian37 - November 11, 2014 at 8:20 am
RE: Bar stool economics - by Chad32 - November 9, 2014 at 9:32 pm
RE: Bar stool economics - by Cato - November 10, 2014 at 9:26 am
RE: Bar stool economics - by Fidel_Castronaut - November 11, 2014 at 8:34 am
RE: Bar stool economics - by Brian37 - November 13, 2014 at 7:33 am
RE: Bar stool economics - by Heywood - November 13, 2014 at 7:07 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Seven states bar people with a criminal record from receiving victim's compensation Angrboda 34 3445 September 23, 2018 at 5:16 am
Last Post: viocjit
  Now Who Knew Economics Could Be So "Complicated?" Minimalist 2 886 April 9, 2018 at 9:02 pm
Last Post: brewer
  The Worst School of Economics EgoRaptor 3 1413 January 28, 2014 at 7:04 pm
Last Post: EgoRaptor
  sceptical economics. jonb 6 1625 January 17, 2013 at 4:39 am
Last Post: KichigaiNeko
  Grinch Economics Tobie 1 1437 April 11, 2012 at 4:19 pm
Last Post: Autumnlicious
  Economics book recommendations Justtristo 3 2102 February 5, 2012 at 6:14 pm
Last Post: RW_9
  Conservative/Libertarian economics and anthropic global warming popeyespappy 11 4983 May 9, 2011 at 2:24 am
Last Post: Autumnlicious
  Austrian Economics reverendjeremiah 18 4403 May 4, 2011 at 1:17 pm
Last Post: reverendjeremiah
  Austrian economics ftw! theVOID 6 2704 December 24, 2010 at 11:46 am
Last Post: Jaysyn



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)