Kentucky Fire Chief: "We ain't taking no niggers here"

[Drich]

Drich, you don't get to call what that bastard did "intolerant"- he's a racist fuck. When I treat a black person no different than any other person, I'm not being "tolerant", I'm being a decent person. When I call that racist fuck a racist fuck, I'm being intolerant of racism and his actions. See the difference?

An asshole is being an asshole to a man for being black.

We're being assholes to an asshole for being an asshole.

Whose ship are you trying to right again?

Again I completely do not care what who did what to who and why..

I am pointing out that you d-bags are no better for using the same hate the racist used to discriminate against the black guy.

You all seem to think the crime/soceitial cancer here is color discrimination. In truth it is hate. The same hate that has been spewed all of two pages of dialog by you 'good' people.

---

I dislike that word being used in the title of this thread. It's so vile it doesn't deserve to be said aloud in any decent establishment. Ryan, can you remove it?

Drich, I know we've been through this a thousand times. The fact that you still hold onto your 'b-but he's intolerant for being intolerant of intolerance!' stance , is downright getting offensive to all of us who have had to hear it refuted, over and over, and over again. I'm beginning to think your brain is handicapped in a way that it is unable to learn anything new whatsoever. You should have a professional take a look at it. No ones interested in giving this thread to you to muddy up with your tired, old, attention grabbing (what controversy!) tactics.

there are a few how fall for my old tactics..

As far as learning anything new, would you be intrested to know that color/race discrimation is not just a western/anglo activity? did you know most countries still embrace racial discrimination as a crutial part of their culture and to some even their deeply held religious beliefs?

Even so they can discriminate with out defaulting to a position of hate. It is the element of hate that makes discrinimation wrong. It is the acceptable rage one segiment of the population is allowed to have over another that breeds oppertunity for men like Stallin, Mao, Kim, Hitler and mossulini to rally and take whole segiment of soceity for themselves. When one gives himself to hate he ultimatly gives over control of himself to the one who regulates hate.

This is the same hate all of you are defending and rolling around in like pigs in the mud.

---

Either way bottom line, regardless of your reasons for it, being intollerant of the intollerant makes one the worst kind hypocrite.

No one has argued for unlimited tolerance. Anyone with half-a-brain could understand that immediately.

Yes, I'm looking at you ... halfwit.

what about tollenence of any kind... because no tollerance has been shown at all when the oppertunity has been given to you.

Just look at your last comment. You call me a half wit just because i point out hypocritical hate in this thread. none of this was even directed at you and the first thing you say is riddled with hate.

So thanks for illustrating my point sport. Good job!