Trying to Understand Many-Worlds Interpretation Better

[Heywood]

That would probably work better, sure, but even that would be loose, as in MWI a persons very history could be vastly different from your own - different looks, different opinions - we're talking about an incomprehensible amount of diversions here. This is why I, and others, feel that MWI is a product of probabilities, trivially true, if true at all. It wouldn't actually imply any of the things that people so often connect to it. Why invoke MWI at all, if we're going to immediately water it down, and what can be said of that which cannot be articulated without butchery?

Hey Proff....perhaps in one of the many worlds...your doomsday prediction came true. Cling to that, might change your perspective.

Many worlds works by splitting one universe into two:



At the point of a split, the two doppelgangers share the same exact history.