RE: Any Theists on AF, I Challenge You to a Debate on the Existence of God
December 28, 2014 at 8:43 pm
(This post was last modified: December 28, 2014 at 8:47 pm by fr0d0.)
(December 28, 2014 at 8:41 pm)IATIA Wrote: lLogic is based on evidential premises.
Prove it
(December 28, 2014 at 8:43 pm)abaris Wrote:(December 28, 2014 at 8:37 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: How am I gap filling by saying that I don't know? That's a scientific answer. Please tell me where I'm making a scientific claim about the supernatural, or vice versa.
My answer still applies. You're believing in a supernatural being regardless. Nothing in the world and the universe as we know it points to the supernatural. So how can logic come up with something supernatural?
Regardless of what? Conflicting evidence? Such as what? I hold these beliefs and am telling you that nothing conflicts.
What would point to something supernatural? I assume you're talking about natural evidence? How can you logically justify that statement? It looks illogical to me: natural evidence of the supernatural.