Any Theists on AF, I Challenge You to a Debate on the Existence of God

[downbeatplumb]

I take supernatural to mean not possibly natural. Outside of the realm of nature. Evidence of the supernatural would require supernatural abilities to detect. Natural evidence of the supernatural is a contradiction in terms.

If it exists science can detect it. Labelling something supernatural is just moving the goal posts so you can have your warm and snugglies.

Logically there are two identical answers, as naturally, we cannot know at all. We have zero natural evidence.

So you freely admit to there being no evidence and yet you persist in your belief.

Now the information that we possess and accept on the problem are not the same, hence the different stances on belief. Given my understanding, you would have to believe in deity, you would have no choice. The logical evidence is overwhelming.

The logical evidence is overwhelmingly in opposition to the existence of god.

Likewise, given your understanding, I would have to disbelieve. I wouldn't have any choice either.

But there is only one "truth" it just so happens that we are right because we can prove the majority of what we believe and for other things we can say we don't know.
We don't have to fall back on the god cop out for our explanations.