RE: How would you regard good evidence for a God you don't now believe in?
January 8, 2015 at 9:53 pm
(This post was last modified: January 8, 2015 at 9:54 pm by Whateverist.)
(January 8, 2015 at 9:38 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: An objectively revealed god, would mostly likely be some kind of demiurge which would still be very interesting but not maximally great.
You are no more able to engage the hypotheticals than my wife. So really, like her, you have to just choose the first one don't you? Or I guess you're saying "fine, science has identified something that qualifies as a god but they missed the big one". Didn't consider that.
I really wanted it to be understood as evidence that only this one creator god existed and NOT the one you already believe in. Oh well, swing and a miss.
(January 8, 2015 at 9:50 pm)Sionnach Wrote: Yeah, you're god, what of it? You're still not worthy of my time or attention.
Don't make me smite thee, youngster.