Your op is flawed Rob. In #1, we establish that X is logically possible. In #2, we demand that #1 cannot be possible if it is only logical, but also physical.
We know, and has Chad has pointed out, that some things that are logically possible are not also physical. The proposition is defeated.
We know, and has Chad has pointed out, that some things that are logically possible are not also physical. The proposition is defeated.