Again we can argue over the big three, but it still remains that all religions are nothing but humans gap filling to make excuses to form groups and set up social pecking orders.
The important thing to do, isn't forcing religion out of existence, but getting more humans to accept that those are personal likes and should be less important than insisting on civility. Use government to protect pluralism yes, but only to the extent of rights, claims themselves however, do not deserve rights, humans are not claims, claims are what humans make.
The important thing to do, isn't forcing religion out of existence, but getting more humans to accept that those are personal likes and should be less important than insisting on civility. Use government to protect pluralism yes, but only to the extent of rights, claims themselves however, do not deserve rights, humans are not claims, claims are what humans make.
