(January 15, 2015 at 11:21 am)Huggy74 Wrote:(January 15, 2015 at 11:17 am)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: You showing an inclination to learn about something you know nothing about but insisting on arguing about would also suffice, thanks.
Your refusal to answer a simple yes or no question is very telling.
No it's not. I answered about 10 pages back, but you refused to even contemplate learning for a second and instead resorted to your default; bullshit.
I could say yes and indiciate that secular structures do not need to be codified or indeed entrenched that that state can still nominally endorse a religion whilst being entirely secular in operations (like the UK), but you wouldn't understand it.
Thankfully the more informed, non-idiotic readers of this thread understand the points I and others have been making for 10+ pages which you do not. And that's all that matters.
-20 I think now, mate.