(January 18, 2015 at 12:17 am)Minimalist Wrote:(January 16, 2015 at 4:03 pm)Chas Wrote: What, exactly, in my response are you arguing about?
You said "in some runs of the scenario" they killed one. My point is that they were not some bored guard staring at the clock waiting for his shift to be over. They knew why they were there and what was going down.
And it did not help them. That queers the test, guy.
None of that addresses what I said, which was:
(January 15, 2015 at 10:08 am)Chas Wrote: This is not terribly surprising. One person with a handgun against two trained men with automatic weapons has predictable results.
Pointing out that the results are no surprise.
Quote:In some runs of the scenario, one of the gunmen was killed - that's better than no gunman killed.
Simple factual statement.
So, again, what the actual fuck are you arguing with?
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
