Creation/evolution3

[The Grand Nudger]

So again evidence.. If this were even remotly true then you should be able to provide a link.

You provided the link moron. Why don't you browse around through all of the things that the technique you mentioned has allowed us to do and determine(and that's just -one- method of a great many)? Silk road offshoots that saw maybe a dozen people in two thousand years? Yep..we can see that too. I have no desire to jump through the hoops held up by a monkey-with-no-soul. Your excuses are noted and rejected.

Reading forward I noticed you did not answer my request for the Evidence of alexander the great's desert marches?

Jump, monkey, jump.

Here is a historical event that supposedly had taken place in the 3ish century bc, upon which thousands of men died. which meant thousands of peices of armor and wepons, animal remains, and equipment and supplies. all happened 3000 years after the exodus. So again sport where is the evidence for this story?

Shakes the hoop.

You didn't read the artical did you? We found them using satalites because we located the cities foundational foot prints. The Jews were wandering in the desert in tents much like alexander the Great's army would have been. So where is the satalite confirmation of Alexander's army?

Magical tents, magical shoes, all withstood the test with no wear, countless scores of people - decades and decades. Why am I providing you with the nagging details? Your claim to biblical scholarship is evaporating. No amount of trying to shift the attention away from your claims will work with me. Your stories are extra-biblical and fare no better in reality than they do by comparison to the fantasy.

(Note if you find some rusty piece of tin I am just going to ask you to imagine what 2 or 3000+ years more in the desert will do to what ever you find so make sure what ever you present is immune to sandblasting and high heat and fridged cold exposure.)

LOL, you didn;t even look it up before you shot off at the mouth. You're worried I might come back with something....wipe the sweat off your lying brow...there is no reason for me provide you with anything. Do work.

Again, how old is this trail?

When did exodus happen? You see, if you can;t place your own fairy tales there's no reason for me to compare dates or even consider them relevant. Do work.

Argumentum ad hominem anyone?
(the evasion of the actual topic by directing an attack at your opponent.)

L2logic. An ad hom is the implication that a persons claim is wrong because something about that person is "wrong". I stated, explicitly, that I didn't see any need to address your claim, not that you were wrong -because- you're a fraud..merely stating the fact that you -are- a fraud.

Your example literally follows the wiki defination, good job sport.

Guess you need to work on reading comprehension as well. Wiki can't help a semi-literate.

again I am asking for specific evidence, not what you assume to be true.

I'd tell you to wiki it yourself....but.....

The last part of Genesis 2 and the first 1/2 of Genesis 3

No dice, lay it out, show us where the bible tells the narrative drich tells us. Your claims set aside the verses you lay claim -to-, charlatan.

Same as above

....indeed.

One would think if you were going to based your whole arguement on a single word you would at least know what the word means before you hang out your dirty landuary exposing yourself to a basic comperhension failure, and follow up correction. To me this would undermine what one would think of your basic comperhension and ablity to formulate sound accidemic thought from it.

You're attempting science buddy, fail. You have no theory.

Now taking this into account (along with the rest of your sad attempt at a dismissal) one could apply all that you said to your own work. How you ask? Because I have Indeed provided BCV,

You have not, because your tale is extra-biblical and there is no explanation to be found within the book. You understand this perfectly well, that's why the crux of the whole thing is "it doesn't say it didn't happen that way" -That's what makes you a charlatan, as opposed to being simply ignorant. You -know- you're selling a bill of goods.

and I even take care in providing the literal definations to the words I use. Rather than haphazardly stringing together basless accusations to forumulate a Argumentum ad hominem Fallacy rather than specifically address what you can not.

L2logic.

In short you are trying to throw me under the bus rather than being made to answer questions you know you have no answers for, by projecting your own intelectual failures onto me.

You throw yourself under the bus, don't blame me for the unfortunate things that escape your mouth. This thread, and all previous threads on this subject are available for anyone to see. That's what makes you a hack.

I've lost any motivation to pussyfoot around with those who have demonstrated their unwilligness to engage in a rational conversation, and particularly so with those who have demonstrated their willingness to lie for christ. No amount of civility is due to you, and your claims are now, precisely as they were when you first made them - complete and utter horseshit. You don;t have BCV, you don't have evidence, you can't form a competent argument (and clearly wouldn't even know what that means), and you don't have a theory. You're shitting in my earholes and I'm not going to smile and engage with you as though you or your claims deserved anything more or less than what I've given. If you don't like being called a hack or a charlatan, there's an easy way to make that stop.

Do work. Sure, you may not find what you want (but you already know that)......at least, though, the deceit won't be so transparent. You'll have shown -your own remarks- the respect and diligence a person might expect to find applied to the things that people decide to advance as their own positions. What is it that you expect from me (or anyone else) when you treat your own statements in the manner that you have?