(January 28, 2015 at 3:19 pm)Tonus Wrote: Your argument comes down to potentially millions of people spending 38 years in an area and leaving no trace, because much smaller groups spending very little time left few traces.I was wrong... You still have no idea what youre arguing against. My Arguement also includes the cities who were inhabbited at the very same time, but for much longer periods hundreds and in some cases for thousands of years... Yet aside from their stone foundations nothing is left. Especially not any of the biodegradeble stuff you are looking for.
Quote:That you refuse to see the issue is not a problem for me, because as I've already pointed out I have no story to try and salvage. Which is why I didn't even bother with the logistics of watering and feeding a city-sized group of people and their livestock or dealing with the daily waste products (let me guess, they "repurposed" the hundreds of tons of fecal matter and urine produced every week?). And all this without building a single stone structure!
So where is all the urine and fecal matter from those cities?
