RE: Is Christianity based on older myths?
February 12, 2015 at 3:39 am
(This post was last modified: February 12, 2015 at 3:41 am by Mudhammam.)
(February 12, 2015 at 3:30 am)robvalue Wrote: OK I see, thanks. Steve better send you some flowers for that work you did for him!No problem. I think we must accept that reconstructing history, especially relatively unknown individuals (hell, even most known ones in their time) is mostly guesswork, and never as objective as one might hope for in a science.
It sounds like Paul is a little more credible than HJ, then. I'd have to look into all this stuff to make a better judgement.
Thanks for the insight
The problem with "historians" assessing this stuff is that they often seem to rely on bogus, fallacious logic to come to conclusions rather than actual evidence. That's not surprising from a christian "scholar" of course. I'd rather historians stuck to the evidence and what can be reasonably demonstrated without making bogus appeals on top of that.
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza