(February 19, 2015 at 4:45 pm)Godschild Wrote:(February 19, 2015 at 11:58 am)Clueless Morgan Wrote: Or no religious symbols on any public ground.
Why, we pay taxes shouldn't our beliefs be represented as well as those who have no belief at all, it's not the fault of religious people that some decide to have no belief. Don't come back saying churches do not pay taxes, I'm referring to individuals here.
GC
You've heard the saying "atheism is a religion like bald is a hair color" right?
Well, not displaying religious symbols on public property is an much an "endorsement" of atheism as the post office, building department, schools or police station not selling hair care products is an "endorsement" of baldness, in that it's no endorsement at all.
I don't get butthurt when the government doesn't display a Vidal Sassoon shampoo bottle on the front lawn of city hall, just like you shouldn't get butthurt when the government doesn't display a crucifix in the same location.
Teenaged X-Files obsession + Bermuda Triangle episode + Self-led school research project = Atheist.
