Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: September 5, 2026, 2:56 pm
Atheist Forums › Community › Atheism v
Fine Tuning Argument

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Fine Tuning Argument
LastPoet Offline
Leader of the gang of jerkoffs(tm)
*****
Religious Views: L'Uomo verrà portato dalla sua creazione
Posts: 18503
Threads: 79
Joined: May 29, 2010
Reputation: 125
#12
RE: Fine Tuning Argument
August 22, 2010 at 7:42 pm
You keep inventing probabilities nogodaloud, and keep running away from peoples arguments. On this thread you claim:

NoGodaloud ? Wrote:Lee Smolin (a world-class physicist and a leader in quantum gravity) estimates that if the physical constants of the universe were chosen randomly, the epistemic-probability of ending up with a world with carbon chemistry is less than one part in 10^220.

Yet, on the "How to debate a Christian" thread you claim:

NoGodaloud ? Wrote:But to have just one life permitting universe, you need 1 to 10^500 attempts to get it done. Thats a 1 with 500 zeros.

I rest my case. You sir, are full of bullshit.
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Community › Atheism v
Fine Tuning Argument

Messages In This Thread
Fine Tuning Argument - by The_Flying_Skeptic - August 20, 2010 at 8:53 pm
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by LastPoet - August 20, 2010 at 9:06 pm
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by Minimalist - August 20, 2010 at 9:33 pm
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by NoGodaloud ? - August 21, 2010 at 12:03 am
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by The_Flying_Skeptic - August 22, 2010 at 3:23 pm
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by Welsh cake - August 21, 2010 at 6:28 am
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by Eilonnwy - August 21, 2010 at 7:09 am
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by tackattack - August 21, 2010 at 7:59 am
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by Eilonnwy - August 21, 2010 at 8:05 am
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by Captain Scarlet - August 22, 2010 at 2:35 pm
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by NoGodaloud ? - August 22, 2010 at 4:26 pm
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by LastPoet - August 22, 2010 at 7:42 pm
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by NoGodaloud ? - August 22, 2010 at 9:11 pm
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by LastPoet - August 22, 2010 at 9:17 pm
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by Captain Scarlet - September 2, 2010 at 5:52 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Kalam Cosmological argument. JJoseph 113 27908 January 10, 2024 at 12:38 am
Last Post: Astreja
  A 21st Century Ontological Argument: does it work. JJoseph 23 7065 January 9, 2024 at 8:10 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Fine Tuning Principle: Devastating Disproof and Scientific Refutation of Atheism. Nishant Xavier 97 29038 September 20, 2023 at 1:31 pm
Last Post: Paraselene
  Conscience and the Moral Argument as Evidence for the Goodness of God. Nishant Xavier 162 39568 July 9, 2023 at 7:53 am
Last Post: Deesse23
  Signature in the Cell: DNA as Evidence for Design, beside Nature's Laws/Fine-Tuning. Nishant Xavier 54 13209 July 8, 2023 at 8:23 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Is the Argument from Degrees contradictory to the 3rd Law of Thermodynamics? FlatAssembler 49 11641 June 26, 2023 at 6:59 pm
Last Post: Belacqua
  Is my argument against afterlife an equivocation fallacy? FlatAssembler 61 15034 June 20, 2023 at 5:59 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  A simple argument against God Disagreeable 149 41121 December 29, 2022 at 11:59 am
Last Post: Mister Agenda
  My Almighty VS your argument against it Won2blv 43 11518 May 5, 2022 at 9:13 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  A "meta-argument" against all future arguments for God's existence ? R00tKiT 225 62989 April 17, 2022 at 2:11 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)