RE: Evolution Theory - please show the proofs
August 24, 2010 at 1:02 am
(This post was last modified: August 24, 2010 at 1:09 am by Shell B.)
(August 24, 2010 at 12:27 am)Entropist Wrote: I hear Obama is a really a Muslim born in Kenya... I've seen his so-called "birth certificate" but I'm absolutely certain its been faked by those evil liberals. Or international Jewish bankers. Or Al Qaida. Or something like that.
Wait, what?
(August 24, 2010 at 12:41 am)NoGodaloud ? Wrote: i opened this thread as a answer to Thedarkestofangels, which stated :
http://atheistforums.org/thread-4459-page-5.html
Quote:Evidence. Proof. Science has it. Creationism and theism do not.
and give him oportunity to show, his assertion is true.
I'm wondering why you chose one theory to counter his assertion. You do realize that "science" is not evolutionary theory? The term science covers a broad spectrum of facts, theories, experiments, etc. What you have done is take one theory, that you presumably don't like, and have turned it into your entire argument against science and for whatever it is you believe. You want to give him an opportunity to show that science has evidence and proof? Ask him about something that isn't a theory. Ask him about something that science declares as fact and universally claims it has proof of.
Can I just say that I hate it when science is referred to as some kind of entity like religion? Science doesn't show or have anything. Branches of science and scientists do. For example, you can say "Christians believe in god", but you can't say "Science believes in evolution." Science is just a branch of study. Like English, Social Studies, History, etc. Science is not the anti-christ. A number of different people study different sciences and they are all individuals. They don't all universally believe or disbelieve anything. Yes, these various sciences have shown us a number of different things, through the people who study them. It just sounds funny when someone says something like "Science is wrong (incorrect)" or "Science tells us. . . ". It's just so non-specific.