"ok. show me empirical evidence of species, where random selection and mutation changed their physical traits in a manner, that new functional limbs, like wings, limbs etc. arose ? "
i've seen pictures of fossils in reputable textbooks showing intermediate functional limbs. what's wrong with the fossils? how else would we explain the offspring of a donkey and a horse, the sterile mule, if not by genetic differences caused over time? how else would you explain why Oceania is the only place we find marsupials?
you said "where random selection [...] changed their physical traits[...]" Random selection (unless you're referring to genetic drift) is not the correct choice of words when talking about a mechanism that causes change in the frequency of alleles, however "natural selection" or any selection that favors a specific trait or group of traits is the correct terminology. I'm telling you this because I don't want people to dismiss your ideas just because you aren't using the right words.
i've seen pictures of fossils in reputable textbooks showing intermediate functional limbs. what's wrong with the fossils? how else would we explain the offspring of a donkey and a horse, the sterile mule, if not by genetic differences caused over time? how else would you explain why Oceania is the only place we find marsupials?
you said "where random selection [...] changed their physical traits[...]" Random selection (unless you're referring to genetic drift) is not the correct choice of words when talking about a mechanism that causes change in the frequency of alleles, however "natural selection" or any selection that favors a specific trait or group of traits is the correct terminology. I'm telling you this because I don't want people to dismiss your ideas just because you aren't using the right words.