RE: Political Compass test
March 18, 2015 at 4:14 pm
(This post was last modified: March 18, 2015 at 4:16 pm by Dystopia.)
Some questions require lots of thinking - For example, the first question about globalization benefiting humanity or corporations is, to start, ambiguous because some people are against globalization - I answered that I "disagree" because, putting it simply, corporations are globalization and benefiting humanity probably requires extra regulation and thus corporations don't have reasons to continue globalization if they are not getting benefits
The one about the one party system I voted "agree" because in a democracy things will inevitably be slower and delayed - But that doesn't mean I think fascism is preferable.
I also strongly disagreed with the nationality V class because I genuinely believe nationality divides us a lot more than class, starting with culture, habits, customs and ideas.
I agreed that controlling inflation is more important because ultimately it affects employment, but I don't think one is genuinely more important than the other.
The question about people being rich and contributing nothing to society is idiotic and based on conspiracies (i.e. "manipulating money", what does this mean? Because if it's genuine manipulation it's a crime)
After analysing some questions I came out as an authoritarian right, but really close to the center line and middle, so I'm moderate and have no place in any party.
The one about the one party system I voted "agree" because in a democracy things will inevitably be slower and delayed - But that doesn't mean I think fascism is preferable.
I also strongly disagreed with the nationality V class because I genuinely believe nationality divides us a lot more than class, starting with culture, habits, customs and ideas.
I agreed that controlling inflation is more important because ultimately it affects employment, but I don't think one is genuinely more important than the other.
The question about people being rich and contributing nothing to society is idiotic and based on conspiracies (i.e. "manipulating money", what does this mean? Because if it's genuine manipulation it's a crime)
After analysing some questions I came out as an authoritarian right, but really close to the center line and middle, so I'm moderate and have no place in any party.
Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you
