(August 29, 2010 at 8:43 am)fr0d0 Wrote: "We" (as in non believers) will not see evidence this is true.
Let's fix this. "We" (as in believers) will not see evidence this is true. Because you look at the answers without allowing for Santa."
If there is no evidence to suggest such a being exists, then there is no reason to conclude that this being is responsible for anything.
If I can't find an answer to something right away, I will never jump to god unless evidence points towards god.
Quite simple and easy to understand really.
There is no reason to believe that pink rabits under the moon's surface created the universe because 1. There is no evidence to suggest that they even exist (just like god) and 2. Even if there was evidence of their existance, you'll still need further evidence to say that they created the universe. There is no evidence for pink rabits unther the moon's surface and there is no evidence to suggest that a god exists. Ta-da!
Why allow god into the equation if there is zero evidence for his existance?
You wouldn't allow the toothfairy into the equation now would you?
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
