Tentatively Christian; looking for a reasonable discussion

[Esquilax]

These words come from your own post. They constitute among the most compelling arguments you've presented so far.

Considering the way you've avoided the majority of my other arguments as though you have no answer to them, I won't take this as a signifier of the actual quality of my argument.

You're clearly saying that I define God as uncreated because that's how I want to define him.

And as I have shown, that's clearly false.

And, as with all the other arguments I've made that you can't rebut, you've ignored the more present point in favor of harping on the irrelevant one. As I've said before, regardless of where the definition comes from, you still can't define your way around an argument. You've selected your definition of god from a range of them, and I don't care what reasons you had for doing so; the point is that "...by definition!" is not an argument.

Now, are you going to address the ninety percent of my arguments that you've thus far simply avoided, or not?