(March 23, 2015 at 9:39 pm)Mezmo! Wrote:(March 23, 2015 at 7:17 pm)Esquilax Wrote: Do you think it's at all effective to argue that Kalam, which posits that reality was created, is justified in this assertion because the category of uncreated things contains reality?And who said that reality is limited to the physical universe. Oh! I guess that seems to be your assumption. Despite the contemplating smilies, you didn't really put much thought into it or you wouldn't have posit such an obvious conflation.
Hey, if you want to posit things beyond the physical universe then please, go right ahead and justify that statement with some evidence. But don't blame me for only believing in things that we have reason to believe in, that's not a weakness in thinking, it's literally the only rational thing that can be done.
And please don't just posit some nonsense argument from ignorance about how materialism can't explain X, therefore non-material reality. Or just assert a bunch of things. Please?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
