I haven't looked it up yet but since every faux conservative outrage piece, from Acorn to Shirley Sherod to Benghazi to the IRS "scandal" has turned out to be complete bs, I'm going to go out on a limb and express my skepticism that there was any deliberate attempt to deceive anyone.
Now back to my issue, I have always posted that the Michael Brown shooting was rendered virtually moot in the context of the larger issue of systematic racism as demonstrated by the over-the-top reaction by the Ferguson Police Department to peaceful protests.
This is hardly an unrelated issue, since the whole point of conservative focus on Michael Brown is to with the implicit argument that if this shooting really was justified, then the whole grievance the community has with charges of systematic racism must also be wrong. Go ahead and deny that this is your tactic.
Now back to my issue, I have always posted that the Michael Brown shooting was rendered virtually moot in the context of the larger issue of systematic racism as demonstrated by the over-the-top reaction by the Ferguson Police Department to peaceful protests.
This is hardly an unrelated issue, since the whole point of conservative focus on Michael Brown is to with the implicit argument that if this shooting really was justified, then the whole grievance the community has with charges of systematic racism must also be wrong. Go ahead and deny that this is your tactic.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
